• Psychological Safety
  • Corporate Training
  • Online Training
    • Complete online course
    • Fundamentals
    • Practices
    • Leadership
    • Advanced
    • Measuring
    • Workshop design and facilitation
    • In Education
    • Delivering Effective Feedback – Online workshop
  • Resources
    • Tool Kits
    • Free Resources
    • Psychological Safety Videos
    • Newsletter
    • Articles
    • Shop
    • Psych Safety Community
    • Podcasts & Talks
    • What is Psychological Safety?
    • Human Organisational Performance (HOP)
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Tool Kits
  • Training
    • "Ignite" for Senior Leaders
    • “Impact” Team Workshop
    • Management Masterclass
    • Delivering Effective Feedback
    • HOP: Human and Organisational Performance
    • CRM for Non-Aviation Teams
    • Train the Trainer
  • Online Workshops
    • Complete Online Course
    • Psychological Safety Fundamentals
    • Practice Masterclass
    • Leadership & Management
    • Advanced Psychological Safety
    • Measuring Psychological Safety
    • Workshop Design and Facilitation
    • HOP Fundamentals
    • Delivering Effective Feedback
    • Psychological Safety in Education
    • Practice Masterclass: Australia and New Zealand
psych safety logo white
  • Resources
    • Tool Kits
    • Free Resources
    • Newsletter
    • Research
    • Shop
    • Podcasts & Talks
    • Videos
    • Community
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Search
    • What is Psychological Safety?
    • The History of Psychological Safety
    • Psychological Safety In The Workplace
    • Research
    • Measure Psychological Safety
    • Human Organisational Performance (HOP)
  • The Psych Safety Team
    • Contact Us
    • About The Team
    • Tom Geraghty
    • Jade Garratt
  • Tool Kits
  • Training
    • "Ignite" for Senior Leaders
    • “Impact” Team Workshop
    • Management Masterclass
    • Delivering Effective Feedback
    • HOP: Human and Organisational Performance
    • CRM for Non-Aviation Teams
    • Train the Trainer
  • Online Workshops
    • Complete Online Course
    • Psychological Safety Fundamentals
    • Practice Masterclass
    • Leadership & Management
    • Advanced Psychological Safety
    • Measuring Psychological Safety
    • Workshop Design and Facilitation
    • HOP Fundamentals
    • Delivering Effective Feedback
    • Psychological Safety in Education
    • Practice Masterclass: Australia and New Zealand
psych safety logo white
  • Resources
    • Tool Kits
    • Free Resources
    • Newsletter
    • Research
    • Shop
    • Podcasts & Talks
    • Videos
    • Community
    • Events
  • Articles
    • Search
    • What is Psychological Safety?
    • The History of Psychological Safety
    • Psychological Safety In The Workplace
    • Research
    • Measure Psychological Safety
    • Human Organisational Performance (HOP)
  • The Psych Safety Team
    • Contact Us
    • About The Team
    • Tom Geraghty
    • Jade Garratt
Human Organisational Performance (HOP)  ·  In The Workplace  ·  Newsletter

Complexity

July 7, 2023

A man goes out on the beach and sees that it is covered with starfish that have washed up in the tide. A little boy is walking along, picking them up and throwing them back into the water. “What are you doing, son?” the man asks. “You see how many starfish there are? You’ll never make a difference.” The boy paused thoughtfully, and picked up another starfish and threw it into the ocean. “It sure made a difference to that one.”


This parable features in “Half The Sky, How to Change the World” by Nicholas Kristof and Sheryl Wudunn, which is an incredible book that makes a powerful case for investing in women and girls in order to address inequity and poor public health (especially of children). The authors refer to it as a Hawaiian parable told to them by a friend, although I’ve also seen it credited as adapted from “The Star Thrower” by Loren C. Eiseley. Maybe it’s both, but either way, I love it. They use it to highlight the need for action even when it seems it futile in the face of great challenges.

Sometimes complexity and scale can mean we see a problem as so big, so difficult, that we are put off even trying. We may feel that a single psychological safety practice isn’t going to transform an organisation, so why bother? But just like the starfish being thrown into the sea, that practice, exercise or small change may make a positive difference to some people, and that makes it worthwhile. Plus, we never know – sometimes the smallest acts can catalyse self-sustaining movements.


Models such as Cynefin (above) and Ralph Stacey’s Matrix (below), show us that we cannot pre-plan our whole way through complex organisational change. We can only take intelligent actions, experiment and learn: probe-sense-respond. We can plan, of course, but what we need to plan is a series of experiments.


Additionally, in a large, complex system, it’s often impossible to distinguish the effect of any one particular action or actor on the overall system, because there are too many variables at play. This can make it impractical to gauge the impact of a specific intervention. So maybe the best thing we can do is to act and try to help, in potentially small ways, and learn from the process of doing so. We can’t prove that a single practice transformed the organisation, but we can know that it made a difference to some people. This may also just become the thing that pushes the needle far enough for a great transformation to begin.

Credit: Virpi Oinonen


I’ve always liked the saying, “The person who says it cannot be done should not interrupt the person doing it.” (Often misattributed to George Bernard Shaw). Just because we can’t know for sure that we’ll be successful, or even be able to measure the impact of our actions, doesn’t mean we shouldn’t act. To loop back to our parable, we absolutely should throw the starfish into the sea.


As a demonstration of the power of small changes to have a large impact, I was thrilled to hear recently from Eileen McCarthy, who has now attended two of our Psychological Safety “Practice Masterclass” workshops. After attending last year, Eileen implemented a number of the practical ideas she took away from the session about improving psychological safety, one being the Andon Cord practice. You can read below her account of the incredible impact that it had on culture and patient safety.

After learning about the Andon cord story, I was awestruck.  The thought that an organization could be so immediately responsive to a defect changed my perspective on how we deal with patient safety issues in healthcare.  If a car manufacturer could respond so quickly and positively to an issue, why couldn’t we do the same in an industry where people’s lives are at stake?  I felt compelled to bring this practice to my organization as part of our journey to a Just Culture.
 
Over the course of a year, we introduced the Andon cord concept and worked with managers and front-line teams to develop similar practices in our Ambulatory Surgery Centers. Our key focus was creating a speak-up culture and immediate, positive team response.  As a result of our efforts, we have seen improvement in every domain of our Just Culture Survey from the previous year.  In some areas, we saw as much as a 30% improvement. 
 
Many of our staff and leaders reacted similarly to the Andon cord story as I did.  Staff are excited about the idea of a swarm response to a safety issue.  Imagine if we could provide the same safety net to our teams in the healthcare industry.  It could transform patient safety.


Eileen McCarthy, Patient Safety Program Manager at Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Mid-Atlantic States



Psychological safety and complexity

As you’ve probably gathered by now, the theme of this newsletter is not allowing complexity and scale to become a barrier to action – these articles and resources all speak to this idea… 

This is fantastic: “Explode on Impact” by Toby Lowe. In complex environments such as public service and social action, it is practically impossible for organisations to demonstrate their unique impact due to the intricate and interconnected nature of complex systems. When organisations (or people) are asked to quantify or justify their impact, it often leads to a ‘corruption of data’ or a false narrative that we tell ourselves and others, creating an unrealistic portrayal of our role in generating change. We make up a story – one that makes sense to us and others, but one that is ultimately not true. This can hinder further work rather than improve it. Instead of asking organisations to demonstrate their impact, we should experiment, learn, and adapt collaboratively. This more accurately represents how impact is achieved in complex environments and is also likely to lead to healthier systems and better outcomes.

This systems map of the outcome of obesity attempts to illustrate complexity and causality — however, it remains a narrow field representation of linear causality. A better visual representation of a complex system would probably be the below:

Photo by Nick Perez on Unsplash
Photo by Nick Perez on Unsplash: The Ecotone between a forest and the sea.

In this post, Tanmay Vora explores seven key aspects of Da Vinci’s mindset, inspired by a book by Michael Gelb, “How to Think Like Leonardo Da Vinci”. Aspect 4 is particularly relevant: Sfumato (Being Comfortable with Ambiguity).

Here, Greg Satell challenges the idea that we need to “break down” silos and hierarchies. Hierarchies can be a force for good (indeed, they often are), and silos can be too. “…instead of trying to break down silos, we need to connect them. Network science tells us that it takes just a small amount of boundary-spanning “random connections,” in order to bring social distance crashing down. We can’t just look at organizational charts, but need to focus on how meaningful relationships form in the real world.” Just as Toby Lowe describes, it is no longer possible to achieve results by simply planning and directing work; instead, we must empower, experiment, learn, and adapt.

Of course, the way we think a hierarchy works is rarely the way it works in practice. Commonly this is known as the difference between “formal structure” and “informal structure”. In this LinkedIn post, Valdis Krebs shares the difference between how an organisation might map or plan a formal structure, and how the emergent structure actually works in practice.

I love this piece by J. B. Rainsberger about false dichotomies. In this case, they explore the false dichotomy between leadership and management, which are interrelated and interdependent of each other, particularly in complex systems. J.B. highlights a way to look for alternative interpretations in order to identify false dichotomies like this, and also points out:

  • Lead when you can, manage when you must.
  • Manage systems, but lead people.


Finally, one of the best pieces about actually working in and with complexity that I’ve ever read, by Fred Hebert, staff SRE at Honeycomb.io. Fred touches on nominal and emergent structures (as Valdis alludes to above), work as imagined vs work as done, cognitive load, local rationality, feedback loops, and notes that none of this is possible without psychological safety. Basically Fred’s article is everything that we geek out on in this newsletter, wrapped in a blanket of complexity. 


This week’s poem:

He Wishes for the Cloths of Heaven, by W.B. Yeats

Had I the heavens’ embroidered cloths,
Enwrought with golden and silver light,
The blue and the dim and the dark cloths
Of night and light and the half-light,
I would spread the cloths under your feet:
But I, being poor, have only my dreams;
I have spread my dreams under your feet;
Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.


P.S.

Friend of the newsletter Cherisa Zafft has a bunch of free Leadership Checkup Workshops each on the third Thursday of every month. Check them out here.


cognitive loadcomplexitycynefinpsychological safetyscale

Tom Geraghty

Tom Geraghty, founder and CEO of Iterum Ltd, is an expert in high performing teams and psychological safety. Leveraging his unique background in ecological research and technology, Tom has held CIO/CTO roles in a range of sectors from tech startups to global finance firms. He holds a degree in Ecology, an MBA, and is pursuing a Masters in Global Health at the University of Manchester. His mission is to make workplaces safer, higher performing, and more inclusive. A renowned speaker, Tom has shared his insights at major events such as The IT Leaders Summit and the NHS Senior Leadership Conference. Connect with him on LinkedIn (@geraghtytom), Twitter (@tom_geraghty), or explore his work at https://tomgeraghty.co.uk and https://psychsafety.com.

Related Articles


its ok
Newsletter
Psychological Safety: It’s OK to…
August 30, 2021
Sal Paradise
Human Organisational Performance (HOP)  ·  Newsletter  ·  Psychological Safety
Psychological Safety: Just Culture and the Met Police
March 31, 2023
Doctor holding a stethoscope in the shape of a heart
PSIRF: The Patient Safety Incident Response Framework
Previous Article
non attachment to results
Non-attachment to results
Next Article
  • Subscribe to the psychological safety newsletter

  • Join one of our online workshops, or find out about our training and consultancy for organisations.

  • tom geraghty psychological safety workshop canada
  • building and maintaining psychological safety for your team
    Download the complete guide to psychological safety in practice
  • psychological safety playbook - feedback
  • Check out our Psychological Safety Practice Playbooks. Including specific practices for Education, Technology, Inclusion and more.

  • psych safety logo

    Sponsorship and advertising. Reach 10,000 weekly subscribers and 500,000 online visitors with your message in our newsletter.

  • psychological safety stickers
    Grab Psychological Safety Stickers from our Online Shop!
  • Categories

    • Newsletter
    • Psychological Safety
      • Create and Maintain
      • Human Organisational Performance (HOP)
      • In Technology
      • In The Workplace
      • Learning and Development
      • Measure
      • Theory and Research
    • Random
  • Recent Posts

    • How you respond matters.
      How you respond matters.
      July 11, 2025
    • Practices that Foster Psychological Safety
      Practices that Foster Psychological Safety
      July 4, 2025
    • Feedback in the workplace
      Feedback in the workplace
      June 27, 2025
    • Job Security and Psychological Safety
      Job Security and Psychological Safety
      June 20, 2025
    • How familiar are people with the concept of psychological safety?
      How familiar are people with the concept of psychological safety?
      June 13, 2025
    • Learning at Psych Safety
      Learning at Psych Safety
      June 13, 2025
    • Why do We Foster Psychological Safety?
      Why do We Foster Psychological Safety?
      June 6, 2025
    • Psychological Safety in Aviation - Special Edition
      Psychological Safety in Aviation - Special Edition
      May 30, 2025
    • Rebuilding Psychological Safety When It's Broken
      Rebuilding Psychological Safety When It's Broken
      May 30, 2025
    • Just Culture
      Just Culture
      May 23, 2025
    • Transactional Analysis
      Transactional Analysis
      May 15, 2025
    • Comfort vs Need
      Comfort vs Need
      May 9, 2025
    • Sociological Safety
      Sociological Safety
      May 2, 2025
    • Humour and Psychological Safety
      Humour and Psychological Safety
      May 1, 2025
    • Safety-Organised Criticality
      Safety-Organised Criticality
      April 25, 2025
    • Leaders are not solely responsible for psychological safety.
      Leaders are not solely responsible for psychological safety.
      April 21, 2025
    • Psychological Safety in Our Personal Lives
      Psychological Safety in Our Personal Lives
      April 17, 2025
    • The Organisational Fabric of Psychological Safety
      The Organisational Fabric of Psychological Safety
      April 10, 2025
    • Colution
      April 7, 2025
    • All Feedback Is Subjective
      All Feedback Is Subjective
      April 4, 2025
    • Micromanagement
      Micromanagement
      March 21, 2025
    • Rewetting Organisations
      Rewetting Organisations
      March 14, 2025
    • Spectra of Participation
      Spectra of Participation
      March 7, 2025
    • Newsletter 201: Learning Types and Toxic Leadership
      Newsletter 201: Learning Types and Toxic Leadership
      February 28, 2025
    • Déformation professionnelle
      Déformation professionnelle
      February 21, 2025
    • Psychological Accessibility: A Discovery in Workplace Inclusion
      Psychological Accessibility: A Discovery in Workplace Inclusion
      February 20, 2025
    • All Models Are Wrong, and Some Are Harmful
      All Models Are Wrong, and Some Are Harmful
      February 14, 2025
    • Accessibility: A Road to Psychological Safety
      Accessibility: A Road to Psychological Safety
      February 14, 2025
    • Reducing Power Gradients
      Reducing Power Gradients
      February 7, 2025
    • Efficiency versus Resilience
      Efficiency versus Resilience
      February 7, 2025
    • How We Respond Matters
      How We Respond Matters
      January 31, 2025
    • Ikigai
      Ikigai
      January 23, 2025
    • Flat Organisations, Hierarchy and Power
      Flat Organisations, Hierarchy and Power
      January 17, 2025
    • Work doesn't have to suck
      Work doesn't have to suck
      January 10, 2025
    • Sometimes I Muck Up
      Sometimes I Muck Up
      January 3, 2025
    • You Have a Body
      You Have a Body
      December 19, 2024
    • Blame
      Blame
      December 19, 2024
    • Types of Power
      Types of Power
      December 6, 2024
    • The 2024 Psych Safety Book List
      The 2024 Psych Safety Book List
      November 29, 2024
    • Psychological Safety Videos, Fraud, Safety in Software, Conflict in Organisations and more!
      Psychological Safety Videos, Fraud, Safety in Software, Conflict in Organisations and more!
      November 22, 2024
    • Psychological Safety Doesn't Mean Feeling Comfortable
      Psychological Safety Doesn't Mean Feeling Comfortable
      November 15, 2024
    • The Chatham House Rule
      The Chatham House Rule
      November 8, 2024
    • A team is only as safe as the least safe person
      A team is only as safe as the least safe person
      November 1, 2024
    • Psychological Safety Newsletter: 184
      Psychological Safety Newsletter: 184
      October 25, 2024
    • Academic fraud, data and dishonesty
      October 19, 2024
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn


Sign up to our newsletter & get weekly insights and research

About

The Psychological Safety Team
Our Mission
Our Core Principles
Privacy Policy
Terms of Business

Learn

Corporate Training
Online Workshops
Newsletter
Professional Certification

Tools

Tool Kits
Articles
What is Psychological Safety?
The History of Psychological Safety

Get Connected

Contact us
Attend a Meetup
Join the Community
Connect with us on LinkedIn
View our YouTube Channel
© 2025 Iterum Ltd
We support LGBTQ+ rights all year round. But we also celebrate pride too.
We support LGBTQ+ rights all year round. But we also celebrate pride!
Content on this website is CC BY-NC-SA
Written by humans, not by AI