power

petals open in hands - Photo by Kyle Zheng

Forced Vulnerability

Forced Vulnerability One of the most persistent patterns in organisational change and dynamics is the search for a shortcut: the belief that if we can just find the right lever to pull, the right activity or artefact, we can bypass

Read More »

Comfort vs Need

Comfort vs Need by Tom Geraghty What do we do when the things that help some people in the team feel psychologically safer don’t work for everyone? Perhaps one person says they need time away from the main meeting group

Read More »
Psych Safety Ladder of Participation

Spectra of Participation

The Spectrum of Participation by Jade Garratt Engagement and participation are terms we often throw around to mean “getting people’s take on issues that affect them.” But not all participation is created equal. Sometimes, “inviting participation” amounts to little more

Read More »
Group of people talking in business attire

Reducing Power Gradients

Reducing Power Gradients By Jade Garratt In our experience, the most effective lever for increasing psychological safety within a team is flattening the power gradient – the gap between those with the most power and those with the least. In

Read More »

Flat Organisations, Hierarchy and Power

Addressing Power through “Flattening” Organisations Steep power gradients are one of the most significant factors that contribute to reducing psychological safety. These steep differentials in perceived power have contributed to many disasters including the Tenerife Airport disaster in 1977, Chernobyl,

Read More »
The different types of power - informal, formal, demographic and expert

Types of Power

Typologies of Power In a few previous newsletters, we’ve gotten into power dynamics, power gradients, “power over” vs “power for” and “power to” (see Mary Parker Follett). Steep power gradients are the number one inhibitor of psychological safety, and addressing

Read More »
suryalila and the om dome

Verbally Speaking Up at Work

Verbally Speaking Up at Work Speaking with a client this week, we surfaced an interesting organisational antipattern to psychological safety. Sometimes, within an organisation, there exists an unwritten rule: voice your concerns, but only do it verbally in a call or meeting where

Read More »
Mary Parker Follett

Power and Mary Parker Follett

Psychological safety, power, and Mary Parker Follett Power dynamics are closely intertwined with psychological safety.  We’ve highlighted power types and addressing power gradients in other pieces, but I wanted to dive into it a bit more this week. Mary Parker Follett (1868-1933), writer, social worker,

Read More »
A diagram of Mary Parker Follett's three 'types of power' - power over, power with and power to

Psychological Safety: Structure and Power

Psychological Safety, Hierarchies and power  This is fantastic, from Richard Bartlett; Hierarchies are not the problem. Richard writes eloquently here to show that hierarchies are not “bad”. Rather, unhelpful or harmful power dynamics are bad – power gradients are what we

Read More »